Skip to main content

The Shortest Blog Ever

How can a QUANTIZED Universe allow for IRRATIONAL numbers???

Think about it!!
(and post your thoughts in comments)
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownOctober 31, 2008 12:51 AM

    great to know that muggu ka kaat diya by 'publishing' it first!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The philosophical JunkieOctober 31, 2008 1:49 AM

    how bored are you???

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sri Harsha DandibhotlaOctober 31, 2008 10:01 AM

    42

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousNovember 18, 2008 2:54 PM

    Irrational numbers are just theoretical constructions. Physical measurements cannot be irrational. Any measurement can be done till the resolution of plank units only. So you can never get irrational measurements. So a quantized universe (quantization being in terms of plank units) cannot allow irrational numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. _manGO_November 18, 2008 2:56 PM

    @sarkar : agreed
    but then what about e n pi .... they are very basic to our mathematics ... is it to say that our mathematics is based on mere theoretical hypothesis

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousNovember 18, 2008 3:05 PM

    well the length of any stick cannot be pi or e. physics deals with physical realities/measurements. irrational numbers do no exists in physical reality simply because no device can measure an irrational number. that is because such a measurement requires an infinite resolution of unit. and that is not possible in a quantized universe where there is a lower limit in resolution i.e. the plank units.

    ReplyDelete
  7. the pure & the genuineApril 09, 2009 4:09 AM

    in simple terms because irrational no. or ratinal no. are real things in an abstract mathematical structure with closure property(of course this is so because it's constructed this way)

    Our real words doesn't allow even the rationals because our faculty of observation is bound by uncertainty principle.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousDecember 26, 2009 8:42 AM

    I want to quote your post in my blog. It can?
    And you et an account on Twitter?

    ReplyDelete
  9. _manGO_December 26, 2009 6:33 PM

    @anon

    as long as u credit and link back ... u can use it ...

    and i am on twitter ... twitter.com/ritwik_mango

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousJanuary 05, 2010 7:48 AM

    Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  11. _manGO_January 05, 2010 12:49 PM

    thank youssss @anon

    and the 2 anons aren't the same ... are they??

    please use your names .. easier to follow people :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conversations with Self

A lot of you keep asking me, “ tu din bhar karta kya ha i ” (what do you do all day in your free time). Here’s the answer. In what follows, most of the lines were spoken in the head, some aloud. And it’s not this coherent in original, it’s been paraphrased. “ I need a plan. I really need a plan. I need to retire, retire early. I can't work for long. I should retire by the time I am 40. Yeah 40 seems reasonable. That gives me 16 years of working life. Spend a couple years doing MBA, and I am left with 14 years. Not bad. I hope I will be able to retire at 40, and not get bogged by social obligation. Obligations? Will I have a family to take care of? A kid maybe? [No comment on this status update yet? Why isn’t anyone online?] Hmm, I can have a kid. How old would he be then? Around 7 I guess. Yeah 33 seems to be a good age to have a kid. And when the kid is 7, that’s a good time to retire. Give my nurturing instincts a way to express themselves [chuckles to self] . Seriously, 7 is a ...
14 comments
Read more

Coming of Age

Sometimes, I just feel lucky to be born when I was , to be born in this time and age, to have seen so many contenders for the "Greatest of All Time" tag. Lucky to be born in the age of Michael Schumacher and watch him beat record after record. To be born in the age of Lance Armstrong, for whom beating opponents and records was but a secondary feat. To be born in the age of Zinedine Zidane, most certainly the best of this generation, the marquee headbutt notwithstanding. Lucky to have watched not one, but two legends, pass the baton in tennis. When Pete Sampras lost in the Wimbledon of 01, it made fans of him hate that pony-tailed guy for ending his quest for a 5th consecutive crown. I know I did. But Pete shouldn’t mind that now, for over the course of next 8 years or so, Roger has shown that when it comes to beauty on the tennis court he has got the entire WTA beat, by a long shot (down the line). And then there’s Sachin Tendulkar , whose one mistimed shot makes your heart s...
6 comments
Read more

Active Learning

Disclaimer #1: I am going a bit off the cuff with this post. Reader discretion is advised. Disclaimer #2: This one too is dedicated to Dr Stephen T Colbert and that brings us to tonight’s WORD: ACTIVE LEARNING . Now folks, every time I am home, I see this commercial on TV - this (kinda hot?) Mom bragging about how a certain DTH operator helped her learn English. Most of you would have seen it. And well, the first time I saw it, when she makes that transition and says pro-"noun"-cia-tion initially, I said to myself, Its pro-"nun"-cia-tion for god’s sake. Thankfully the ad makers took care of that. So, why am I discussing pronunciations here? Well the simple fact is that most of the people get that pronunciation wrong. This is ok, considering it’s not our first language. People also get "restaurant" wrong. Hell, even I don’t know how to pro-NOUN-ce " restaurant ". You see, French may be damn seductive, but it’s not the most phonetic of languages. ...
5 comments
Read more